grand conspiracy of New York Times against Pakistani Journalists & Newspapers

New York Times is the newspaper based on conservatives and critic columnists and journalists, the newspaper censured against Pakistani journalists and newspapers of Pakistan including “Pakistan Daily” , “Dawn Newspaper” and some channels whereas Pakistani journalists have always played their vital role in journalism. Three months ago, a report appeared in New York Times, where they strongly criticized the newspaper Pakistan Daily in their News Blog as “A grand conspiracy theory from Pakistan” written by Robert Mackey, that

“The Web site Pakistan Daily is an Islamabad-based hub for Pakistani citizen

journalism, promising Pakistani readers: “Your News. Powered by You.” It is also an

excellent place to turn if you want to read in on the latest conspiracy theories making the

rounds in that country. Or just get very scared.”

Nytimes further writes about president Zardari that.

“Mr. Zardari displayed a shaky grasp of where exactly the line between fact and fiction lies, since he also recounted a story about Oliver North having supposedly warned Congress about the dangers posed by Mr. bin Laden in 1987”

The newspaper pointed out against our president Asif Ali Zardari, for being Shaky grasp, which is deplorable to observe against such journals. After all, many of the people commented against president zardari & Nawaz Sharif and availed the opportunity to inscribe bad comments after such journals on nytimes. The newspaper further writes,

“While most of the conspiracy theories posted on Pakistan Daily seem easy to debunk — like allegations that “Osama bin Laden may be Jewish” or that Islamist militants in Pakistan’s Swat Valley are Indian intelligence agents — it is not hard to understand why some Pakistanis are so willing to believe that unseen forces are behind their current troubles. After all, during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s, the United States did in fact work closely, and secretly, with Pakistan’s spy service, the Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence, or ISI, to destabilize that country’s government by supporting Islamic extremists like Mr. bin Laden.”

The columnists have always tipped out a subject that could be deeply considered by analysts’. My friends even in United Kingdom, US and middle east told me about nytimes that, being in modern era of 2009 New York times seems to be an old fashioned newspaper of sixties, the story or news appear on nytimes gives the impression as a fiction or story, consequently, if any buddy say that nytimes is a tabloid of sixties, hence this sentence doesn’t need any proof.

Nytimes further writes that, Dawn newspaper reported, “Taliban are supported by foreign directives”.

Elements of Pakistan’s government have also obviously played on the fears of the population to win their cooperation at certain times. In fact, they have done it as recently as last week. As my colleague Dexter Filkins pointed out, the prominent Pakistani newspaper Dawn reported last Friday reported that Pakistani  soldiers were using the threat of shadowy foreign forces to encourage citizens to support their current

battle with the Taliban. According to Dawn:

“The security forces also distributed pamphlets in various areas accusing the Taliban

of playing in the hands of anti-Pakistan elements. ‘They are the same as Jewish forces who are against the existence and security of the country and wanted to create disturbance in the region,’ read a leaflet.”

Today every citizen has accepted that Taliban were directed by foreign directives in past, even Hillary Clinton herself accepted about US links with Taliban. In this case, it was dead sure that Taliban once again might be recruited by your holy government today. The newspaper censured against our prominent columnists Ahmed Qureshi, that presence of US is not less than psy-ops (physiological operation).

According to Mr. Quraishi, the entire battle against militants in Pakistan is nothing less than a huge “American psy-ops” campaign to distract from the failures of the United States in Afghanistan. Mr. Quraishi writes:In less than two years, the United States has successfully managed to drop from news headlines its failure to pacify Afghanistan. The focus of the Anglo-American media – American and British – has been locked on Pakistan. In order to justify this shift, multiple insurgencies and endless supply of money and weapons has trickled from U.S.-occupied Afghanistan into Pakistan to sustain a number of warlords inside Pakistan whom the American media calls ‘Taliban’ but they are actually nothing but hired mercenaries with sophisticated weapons who mostly did not even exist as recently as the year 2005.

With the intention of Qureshi’s article, all journalists were amalgamated to acknowledge the US as psy-ops and operating in Pakistan, after obliteration of the Taliban from Swat and Malakand division, now Taliban has turned into form of black water. As black water is operating in Pakistan, see blue area of Islamabad, every upper story of the building is restricted and no buddy is allowed to visit or ask, what is going on there? US have presumed Pakistan as their blessed home land, then why are they still suspecting against our premier intelligence agency ISI in recent statements of Mike Mullen, which is not less than tarnishing Pakistan’s image.

As a matter of fact in recent the matter appeared about prominent columnist & journalists Dr. Shireen Mazari after her press conference, according to analyst report, it was nytimes that did informed US ambassador Anne W. Patterson to had an action against Dr. Mazari’s columns and discontinue its role in “The News” International. However, we do not have proof for saying that, but we are dead sure about the antagonistic design of nytimes and its work of criticism at this time also.

And thereof, New York Times has been much conservative to our journalists even in past, and yet to fail our prominent columnist from their job. If US embassy can take a stand for nytimes, why shouldn’t our embassy defend of our Journalists and newspapers? I think we cannot expect from apologizers however, journalists would continue their struggle, and hoped the media would be independent under the current government of Pakistan, and US embassy would be officially directed to be in the limits next time. By Asad Khan betini